|
Information on Polycarbonate Water Bottles, BPA, and Safety
|
-
|
|
-
Ever since the Today show began running segments on the safety of water bottles, many of us – Prime employees included – have been trying to understand this issue.
And as you know from the Eco-Promise we introduced in 2008, Prime believes that our role is to provide the facts to you, our valued distributors, so that you can make informed decisions about what’s best for you and your customers.
So here is what we have learned.
Polycarbonate is a lightweight shatterproof stain resistant plastic with glass-like clarity that has been used for more than 50 years to make thousands of everyday items including dental sealants, liners of food cans, CDs, cell phones, safety glasses, and food containers such as baby bottles, water bottles and food storage containers. Polycarbonate is manufactured from a chemical called bisphenol A or BPA.
During these past 50 years polycarbonate and BPA have been studied extensively for health and safety by the government, by private researchers and by industry. Most agree that BPA can disrupt the hormonal system but there is a wide divergence of opinion between scientists as to whether or not a health risk is posed by the small amount of BPA that might migrate from a polycarbonate container into whatever food or liquid the polycarbonate contains.
The government regulatory agencies in the US, Canada, Europe and Japan, among others, still contend, even today, that polycarbonate containers are safe.
So why has the controversy resurfaced now?
The Today segments were spurred by a new study on BPA by the National Toxicology Program (NTP),
an agency within the US Department of Health and Human Services. On April 14, 2008 NTP released
a draft report of a new study they conducted. In contrast to previous studies that have concluded
that that low exposure to BPA did not pose a health risk, this report concluded that there was
“some concern” – particularly during development – and that further study is warranted.
Click here to download a pdf of the entire draft brief report.
Here is a key excerpt:
| |
The scientific evidence that supports a conclusion of some
concern for exposures in fetuses, infants, and children comes
from a number of laboratory animal studies reporting that
"low" level exposure to bisphenol A during development can
cause changes in behavior and the brain, prostate gland,
mammary gland, and the age at which females attain puberty.
These studies only provide limited evidence for adverse effects
on development and more research is needed to better understand
their implications for human health. However, because these
effects in animals occur at bisphenol A exposure levels similar
to those experienced by humans, the possibility that bisphenol
A may alter human development cannot be dismissed.
|
|
Then, a week or so later, Health Canada, the regulatory body in Canada, announced that
it was initiating a 60 day public comment period on whether to ban the importation, sale
and advertising of baby bottles which contain bisphenol A.
What is Prime Doing?
Prime recognizes that many consumers agree with the FDA and the studies supporting
the safety of polycarbonate water bottles. Accordingly, as long as the FDA and Health
Canada continue to maintain that polycarbonate water bottles are safe, we will continue
to sell our current stock. However, unless the health risks raised in the draft brief
are studied further and determined to be of no concern, Prime will phase out polycarbonate
bottles during 2008 in favor of alternative materials.
Related
links for further information:
Update 6/11/2008 :
Clash Arises on Safety of BPA in Plastic Items
Update 5/20/2008 :
NYTimes Issues Correction: Not all bottles labeled with “7” contain BPA!
Update 5/14/2008 :
Testimony before Senate Subcommittee: FDA defends safety of baby bottle chemical
Update 5/2/2008 :
FDA Commissioner Andrew C. von Eschenbach letter on Bisphenol A controversy
Update 5/2/2008 :
Message for Consumers from FDA
National
Toxicology Program – Full Text on Draft Brief on Bisphenol A
National
Institutes of Health Q&A on Bisphenol A (BPA) and the Draft Brief
Health
Canada Press Release
FDA interview 4/29/08 updating its poistion on BPA in light of the NTP draft brief
CPSC agrees with FDA that BPA is safe. Bill introduced to ban BPA in children’s products up to 7 years old.
San
Diego Union-Tribune: Studies Stir Confusion on Safety of Plastics
Statement from Cool Gear about the
safety of their bottles
Bisphenol-A Website
Policy
of European Food Safety Authority<
STATS
website
FDA Statement
on Nalgene Website
Polycarbonate
Safety Studies
Legislation to Ban
Children’s Products with Bisphenol A Defeated
FDA
Reaffirms the Safety of Plastic Baby Bottles
The Today show created a misconception that
recycling code 7 always mean “Polycarbonate”. Code 7 means “Other”.
All polycarbonate bottles are labeled “7” but not all “7’s” are
polycarbonate.
Click here to
download a “Smart Plastics Guide” published by The Institute for Agriculture
and Trade Policy (IATP) explains what codes 1-7 really mean
Back to Product Safety
|
|
|